Quilt History Snippets - January 2025

 
Kathy Moore

What:   Review of Uncoverings 1993, Volume 14 of the Research Papers of the American Quilt Study Group, edited by Laurel Horton

Topic:    “Surfacing: The Inevitable Rise of the Women of Color Quilters’ Network”

Author:   Sandra K. German

In 1993 the author identified a gap in the “thriving” condition of the “growing” American quiltmaking and scholarship industry. She found “attitudes and perceptions of some American quiltmakers who feel that barriers exist between themselves and the mainstream.” And she lauds the Women of Color Quilters’ Network for evolving “to help meet the needs of disenfranchised quilters.” [p. 137]


Some of what German has to say is challenging but serves to prove her points. They are difficult to deny in many cases, but there is room for discussion and clarification. Looking around at guild meetings most of us attend as well as AQSG Seminar meetings, one cannot deny her statement, “there is a large discrepancy between the numbers of European American quilters, guilds, teachers, lecturers, curators, writers, editors, international exchange candidates, fellowship recipients, and so on, and their African American counterparts.” [p. 139-140] What follows is a detailed explication of the ways in which African American’s “visibility” in art and craft in America has been, and is, sidelined. It is a concept she credits Ralph Ellison with bringing to the forefront in the 1950s, in his book, Invisible Man.


German’s discussion of “invisibility” seems a very good opportunity to explore the effects and consequences of racial and sexist social and cultural attitudes across many generations to the present. Given all the many years since the Civil Rights movement in American and the many ways in which we have experienced the consequences of sexism and racism, one would think we would be past the need to think about and discuss this issue.


Sadly, there is more work to do and revisiting this article may just be a good way to start that discussion. Have her issues changed? If yes, how have they changed? What of her points are still relevant? What can we do to resolve these issues? What, if anything, does AQSG need to do about these issues?



Best wishes to you all for the new year. Let’s make 2025 the best it can be. I hope to see you all at Seminar in the fall.

Share Post



June 4, 2025
What: Review of Uncoverings 1994, Volume 15 of the Research Papers of the American Quilt Study Group , edited by Virginia Gunn Topic: “An Album of Baltimore Album Quilt Studies” Author: Jennifer F. Goldsborough As a participant in “planning the 1994 exhibition of its Baltimore album quilt collection,” Goldsborough we able to participate in and observe at the ground level the study and process leading up to the Lavish Legacies exhibition. Goldsborough’s paper “delineates the methodology of the study and the contributions of several sorts of historians, conservators and contemporary quilters as well as discussing the most important findings and conclusions.” [p. 73] Goldsborough spends some time describing Baltimore album quilts, their creative history, and their distinguishing characteristics. The details are specific and a good primer for newcomers to the story of Baltimore quilts. Dr. William Rush Dunton, Jr.’s contribution to the story of the revelation of Baltimore album quilts in the twentieth century is credited and an important point that cannot be dismissed. Likewise, Dena Katzenberg’s catalogue and exhibition of these quilts which traveled across the country between 1980 and 1982 is given its due. [p. 76] Goldsborough details her personal research process and activities which began when “the Maryland Historical Society committed to a study and exhibition of the Baltimore album quilts in its collection” for the 1994 exhibition season. [p. 77] This is well described and a good guide for all of us as we try to do our own quilt research. Central to her process was the ability to collate information from hundreds of Baltimore quilt images and sort them into groups which she then organized according to relative complexity and sophistication. [p. 77] From this process Goldsborough developed three conclusions which she describes on page 78. Goldsborough describes the work of previous scholarship in defining specific designers of Baltimore quilt blocks and their specific characteristics. She then begins to detail the questions the team sought to answer or clarify in their pre-exhibition research. It was a bit like peeling the layers of an onion from the nineteenth century and is very informative for us in our own research processes. Her insightful and thorough summary on page 105 is long, detailed, and multidisciplinary in its approach. Finally, Goldsborough’s observations of the creative process in the designing and making of a Baltimore Album raffle quilt provided her opportunities to compare and contrast her conclusions and assumptions about the making of the original Baltimore Album quilts. She identifies herself as an outside observer and her descriptions of this process are equally interesting and insightful. It is striking that she was “reinforced” in her “belief that it is risky to interpret a quilt’s symbolic and emotional content without a sure record of the maker’s own deepest thoughts and feelings.” That’s a lesson we all can take to heart as we do our own research and reporting. [p. 108] This is a valuable source and guide for anyone interested in quilt history and in researching a quilt or a group of quilts. The notes and references section should be a good guide for anyone wanting to do their own research on any quilt(s).
May 1, 2025
Quilt History Snippets May 2025
April 9, 2025
What: Review of Uncoverings 1994, Volume 15 of the Research Papers of the American Quilt Study Group, edited by Virginia Gunn Topic: “Aesthetics and Ethnicity: Scotch-Irish Quilts in West Virginia” Author: Fawn Valentine
Show More